Skip navigation
Contact No's - ROI 048 3755 1260  NI   028 3755 1260

Safety of low dose radiation: letter in The Times, 7 October 2015

It’s clear from Chernobyl, which has turned into an unlikely wildlife refuge, that low doses of radiation do no harm

Sir, Your report (Oct 6) on how wildlife is thriving in the Chernobyl exclusion zone illustrates that we have an excessively cautious approach to the hazards of nuclear radiation. Not only is wildlife flourishing when not having to compete with humans for land, but older residents who refused to move out after the 1986 disaster are dying now of old age rather than from the effects of radiation.

The message is clear: low doses of radiation do no harm. Aberdonians suffer no ill-effect from the relatively high natural level of background radiation from the granite used to build their city. Similarly, residents would find a return to the Chernobyl exclusion zone or to Fukushima, abandoned after the damage to reactors caused by the 2011 tsunami, perfectly safe.

Maintaining an unnecessarily low limit for exposure to radiation, in the face of hard evidence, remains a major barrier to the expansion of the world’s cleanest, safest form of reliable and affordable energy.

Martin Livermore

Scientific Alliance, Cambridge 

Current Issues


Future costs of UK energy supply

The Scientific Alliance recently published part 1 of an examination of National Grid's Future Energy Scenarios, dealing with security of supply. We are now pleased to publish part 2 - cost of supply. The authors - Dr Capell Aris and Colin Gibson - conclude that building more gas and nuclear stations would be considerably less expensive than any of the NG scenarios, as well as offering better energy security.

What's New

14 October 2016: Read the new report by Dr Capell Aris, published jointly with the Adam Smith Institute - Solar power in Britain: the Impossible Dream