Skip navigation
Contact No's - ROI 048 3755 1260  NI   028 3755 1260

Scientific Alliance Newsletter

- Key issues in 2006 Key issues in 2006 Looking back over press coverage this year, there are a number of issues which have emerged or reappeared. Crop biotechnology, wind power, nuclear power, biodiversity, pesticides and other chemicals figure high on that list, but there is one issue which has dominated the environmental debate: climate change. Indeed, this is surely now the defining concern of the early 21st century. Next February sees the publication of the IPCC’s Fourth Assessment Report, and it seems inevitable that a high profile debate will continue for some time to come...
- REACHing for the impossible? - Climate records - Wind farms: beauty or the beast? - Spud-U-Don't Like? REACHing for the impossible? REACH – the Registration, Evaluation and Approval of Chemicals regulation – has this week been approved by the European Parliament on its second reading. The vote was on a compromise position previously reached with the Council, and the regulation now has to receive formal approval from Council before implementation starts next year. The new regulatory regime has been many years in the making, and has been fiercely debated by the...
- More optimism this week - Rethinking the coach - More evidence that mobile phones are not a health risk - Pale green from Brown More optimism this week Last week, we covered the statement by James Lovelock that he expected “global heating” (his words) to decimate the human race, leaving only perhaps half a billion of us inhabiting favoured, island locations. Although a catastrophe by anyone’s standards, this represents a form of optimism in the context of Lovelock’s uniquely pessimistic view of how humans have caused harm to Gaia.   Some have taken a far...
- The future of European science - Meanwhile, in the UK... - New recruit at the Gates Foundation - Apocalyptic visions and optimism The future of European science The European Parliament has this week approved the plan for the next wave of EU-funded research. Framework Programme 7 (FP7 in typical Brussels jargon) will commit €54 billion to a range of R&D initiatives from 2007 to 2013. The programme is due to be formally adopted by Council on 5th December. The fact that FP7 has not even been finally agreed yet may come as a surprise to many people who are interested but not...
- Nairobi: progress or failure? - The Big Ask: Friend or FOE? - Farming, pharming and fuel - Edible cottonseed: the end justifies the means - An apology Nairobi: progress or failure? Kenya’s capital was the venue for this year’s major international meeting on climate change, from 6th to 17th November. In the unique language of UN diplomacy, it was officially referred to as the Twelfth Conference of the Parties to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change and Second Meeting of the Parties to the Kyoto Protocol (or UNFCCC COP 12 and Kyoto Protocol COP/MOP 2). Unpicking the...
- Alternative fuels - Thoughtful comment on climate change - Seeing the wood for the trees - No more wires? Alternative fuels With the present focus on climate change policy, alternative energy sources of various sorts have also been much in the news. Nuclear fusion, for one, is the subject of an article in the BBC’s Green Room series (Nuclear fusion: a necessary investment). The author is Kaname Ikeda, nominated as director general of the Iter project (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor) to be constructed near Marseille. This represents the next step on the road...
- Chaotic world of climate truth - European power blackout/IEA report - Air travel of the future Chaotic world of climate truth This was the headline for last week’s piece in the Green Room series from the BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/6115644.stm). It presents an interesting viewpoint from Mike Hulme, director of the Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. Despite being very much in the mainstream of climate change research and believing that the evidence points to continued warming and negative consequences, Professor Hulme criticises those activists who have...
- Encouragement of UK science - Over-fishing versus fish farming - The Stern review - The New Scientist Encouragement of UK science It is widely reported today that Tony Blair has made a speech encouraging the country to “stand up for science”. This is good. It is important that our political leaders recognise that scientific knowledge underpins the very fabric of modern societies. However, we have a paradoxical situation where science continues to be overlooked or undervalued – even distrusted –  by many.   The good news is that the present government...
- Personal searching or scientific censorship? - Wood-burning stoves in the developing world - The Stern review - Correction Personal searching or scientific censorship? The ever-inventive Google is now offering the Google Custom Search Engine. Users can set up a bespoke service which only looks at certain websites, for example, or customises and presents the results in particular ways. Since we all know that there is an awful lot of dross on the Internet, at first sight this looks eminently sensible. After all, most of us look only at the first few results of a search, or fine-tune our...
- Environmental issues - Benefits of fish "outweigh risks" - Environmental impact of the hydrogen economy - Carbon offsetting Environmental issues Readers of the last few editions of this newsletter could be forgiven for thinking that the Scientific Alliance was a single issue organisation, dealing only with climate change science and policy. This is actually far from the truth, but this has been the issue hitting the headlines, and we feel we have a legitimate contribution to make to the debate. So, no apologies for focussing on this recently, but we should set the record...

Current Issues


Future costs of UK energy supply

The Scientific Alliance recently published part 1 of an examination of National Grid's Future Energy Scenarios, dealing with security of supply. We are now pleased to publish part 2 - cost of supply. The authors - Dr Capell Aris and Colin Gibson - conclude that building more gas and nuclear stations would be considerably less expensive than any of the NG scenarios, as well as offering better energy security.

What's New

14 October 2016: Read the new report by Dr Capell Aris, published jointly with the Adam Smith Institute - Solar power in Britain: the Impossible Dream