Skip navigation
Contact No's - ROI 048 3755 1260  NI   028 3755 1260

GM evidence

Dave Morris (Letters, 7 September) objects to Professor Trewavas’s use of scientific evidence to support GM crops. What would he prefer? Emotion? Rhetoric?

Adoption of GM technology has delivered huge benefits for farmers and the environment, much in the Third World. William Klumper and others from the University of Gottingen published a paper in 2014 showing that in-built resistance to pests has meant a 41 per cent reduction in chemical usage and a 69 per cent increase in profit for the farmers. Surely that is a good thing by any measure?

The Scottish Government will have a much bigger challenge when invited to extend their GM ban to imports of GM soya – widely used in Scotland’s “clean and green” beef industry. Vytenis Andriukaitis, EU health commissioner, has presented proposals to allow national capitals to prohibit their farmers from using imports of GM feed for their livestock. There is no evidence that feeding GM soya to livestock does it any harm at all (or indeed any evidence that humans come to any harm from eating GM foods) but is that to be ignored as well?

Edward Baxter

Gilston Mains

Leven

Current Issues


Future costs of UK energy supply

The Scientific Alliance recently published part 1 of an examination of National Grid's Future Energy Scenarios, dealing with security of supply. We are now pleased to publish part 2 - cost of supply. The authors - Dr Capell Aris and Colin Gibson - conclude that building more gas and nuclear stations would be considerably less expensive than any of the NG scenarios, as well as offering better energy security.

What's New

14 October 2016: Read the new report by Dr Capell Aris, published jointly with the Adam Smith Institute - Solar power in Britain: the Impossible Dream